Dr. Francis Sizer, a former Catholic priest, led the largest Catholic
Charismatic healing meetings in the United States. He knew what was
wrong with people, and then he had major miracles. Then suddenly he left
the Catholic church. Dr. Francis Sizer says a power encounter with the
Holy Spirit changes you forever. And the supernatural follows!
When
he was baptized in the Holy Spirit and Fire, Dr. Francis Sizer was
taken into Heaven and given two gifts. First, his hands caught
supernatural fire, and they are still on fire today! When he prays,
major miracles take place. His second gift is the discernment of
people’s physical and emotional problems. Dr. Sizer’s new book, Power
Encounters, and the companion 3-CD series will equip you to have your
own supernatural encounters with THE gift-giver, the Holy Spirit.
Francis not only prays to impart the Fire, but also for your healing! He focuses on three topics:
•
Baptism in the Holy Spirit. Discover Old Testament prophecy on the
coming of the Holy Spirit, who enables personal holiness and
supernatural gifts through the fruits of the Spirit.
• Healing. Learn about the three kinds of healing including healing from curses and destructive patterns of behavior.
•
Deliverance. Find out how spiritual warfare works; the devil knows the
power of the Blood—you should too. Learn how to use your authority to
rebuke the enemy.
Dr. Sizer shows how to walk in greater intimacy
with the Holy Spirit to have your own powerful encounters. And that is
how we are changed!
Dr. Francis J. Sizer is a former Catholic
priest who led the largest Catholic Charismatic healing services in the
United States during the 1970s. Since then he ministers to all
denominations as a healing evangelist. He is a licensed clinical
psychologist and ministers in healing — physical, emotional, and
spiritual.
Sunday, January 27, 2019
Thursday, January 24, 2019
Quitting to Win
Are
you afraid that if you quit too many jobs or switch careers too
often, your resume (CV) will make you look undesirable? And who’s
gonna hire you then? No one wants a loser who can’t stay put.
You’re
probably right to be concerned… assuming your primary career goal
is to work for a company that wants to own you rather than simply pay
you to do some work for them.
The
funny thing is that many people who have extremely successful careers
seem to completely ignore this advice, building the kind of resumes
that would disgust any reasonable HR person.
For
example, whose resume looks like this?
cab
driver
landscaper
vitamin
distributor
glass-blowing
lathe operator
travel
agent
gas
station manager
U-Haul
dealer
moped
salesman
restaurant
cook
business
consultant
Answer:
David Allen, author of the ever-popular productivity classic Getting
Things Done. Last I heard he was expecting to do about $6 million in
sales this year (source: CNN). That’s a lot of mopeds!
Yes
yes, I know he’s the exception. Everyone who gets away with this
kind of thing is the exception of course. Damned cheaters! We
wouldn’t want to dent anyone’s comfy little excuse for sticking
with a job they don’t like.
From
the looks of his resume, it would appear that David Allen is a
lifelong quitter.
Doesn’t
he realize what an amazing career he could have had as a cab driver?
He could have become one of the best cab drivers in California. He
might be on his 4th or 5th cab by now.
And
why did he have to give up on landscaping? Think of all the hedge
mazes that will never exist because he quit. Now that’s a shame.
OK,
so maybe he just wasn’t cut out for cab driving or landscaping, but
surely he could have gone far as a vitamin distributor. Look at all
the fabulous supplements we have today. He could have made millions
pushing pills. He’s gotta be upset about losing that job. It was
pure colloidal silver.
But
nooooo… this guy couldn’t hold a job to save his life.
Yet
somehow Mr. David Allen is able to convince businesses to pay him
$20,000 a day to teach them productivity skills — the same
businesses whose HR departments would likely throw him out if he
tried to apply for a regular job.
Hmmmm…
kinda makes you wonder, doesn’t it? Is it possible that quitting
could actually increase your productivity?
Perhaps
the truth is that you can switch careers as much as you’d like —
and that those who’d judge you harshly for it are probably just
pissed that you’re reminding them of how stuck they are. Do they
really have your best interest at heart… or are they trying to
enlist your support in assuaging their own self-doubt and
insecurity?
Maybe
it’s not such a great idea to go out of your way to impress the HR
person who’s only looking for the most submissive loser they can
find to fill a position that no one in their right mind would want to
do for more than a couple weeks anyway. If you up and quit on them,
they’ll just have to find another glass-blowing lathe operator who
isn’t as smart as you.
Isn’t
it amazing how social conditioning can teach you to place a high
value on something that a free-thinking sane person would perceive as
dreadfully undesirable? Maybe we should make the people that fall for
that scheme pay more taxes too; they probably won’t even notice. Oh
wait… we already do that.
If
you can’t seem to hold a job, perhaps you’re cursed with genius.
One of the biggest quitters of all was Leonardo da Vinci. I wonder if
his parents ever told him to stop flitting about — painting,
engineering, sculpture, botany, anatomy, architecture, music, poetry,
etc. — and just stick with one thing. Otherwise, no one would hire
him. Imagine Leonardo’s Mom saying to him, “For Christ sakes,
Leo! Last week you told me you were going to be an engineer… and
now I catch you painting! You march yourself back outside, young man,
and go finish that Yard-a-pult monstrosity you started last week.”
So
dark the con of man.
Thursday, January 17, 2019
Scaling Your Value
If
you want to provide value in ways that scale, you ought to think
about scalability when choosing the format for providing your value.
Some modes of providing value scale much better than others.
The
Mindset of Scaling
Basically
you want to consider these three questions:
What
is the value I’m providing and to whom?
What
would it look like for 100 people to receive similar value
simultaneously?
How
can I continue to provide value while I’m sleeping?
Let’s
begin with the first question. Suppose you’re currently working as
a hairstylist. You provide value by cutting and styling people’s
hair. And suppose you currently serve one client at a time, so your
income is determined by the number of clients you serve and how much
you charge your average client. Maybe you sell some products on the
side as well.
You
can increase your income by becoming more skilled or by improving the
way you market your services, so you can charge more per client. But
your income is still largely determined by how many clients you can
get into your chair. Scaling beyond a certain point becomes
difficult.
Now
let’s try the second question. You couldn’t personally perform
hairstyling services for 100 people simultaneously, so you’ll need
help to provide this much value at once. You could recruit 100
stylists, perhaps by opening a very large salon. Then you could
invest your time in marketing and advertising, both for clients and
stylists, and it’s easier to scale these activities than it is to
scale styling hair. This might take some investment of course, but if
you received a share of each stylist’s revenue, you could scale
your income by hiring and training more stylists. Eventually you
might need to branch out to other regions and open more salons too.
There
are other pathways of course, but the key is that someone or
something else needs to be doing the haircuts. You have to break free
of the limitation of performing each haircut yourself. Instead of
doing the haircuts, you need to be responsible for making the
haircuts happen, which is a more flexible and expansive way of
thinking about providing value. If the value has been received
because of what you’ve set into motion, you’re still providing
it.
What
about the third question? If you want to provide haircuts even while
you’re sleeping, you could open a 24/7 salon and have stylists
working there at all hours. Or you could offer franchises for your
salons. Or you could create courses or training programs for stylists
or for other salon owners. If you make your training available
online, then people could take your courses anywhere in the world,
and people could be learning and using your methods to cut hair even
while you’re sleeping.
Digital
Scaling
Putting
content into digital form is a major scalability breakthrough that
allows you to create something once and then leverage it to provide
value to people again and again at near zero cost.
The
advantage of putting value into digital formats like text, audio,
video, images, or software is that you’ve eliminated some major
barriers to scalability. In particular, you’ve decoupled the
delivery of your value from your personal time.
Going
back to the hairstylist example, if you create a blog, video, ebook,
or online course to help other stylists, then there’s no effective
limit on how many other stylists can receive your value, even while
you’re sleeping.
The
main difference here is in mindset. By asking different questions,
you end up with different solutions. The main focus is on how to
provide value to more people. Today that focus is likely to lead you
to the Internet eventually. The Internet is humanity’s great
scaling mechanism for providing value globally.
How
to Scale
A
good first step in devising scalable approaches is to stop doing
things that don’t scale well. At least stop doing them in the ways
that don’t scale.
For
the hairstylist that means to stop cutting so much hair because
cutting hair yourself doesn’t scale well. Put more time and energy
into figuring out how to make good haircuts happen. For instance,
book slightly fewer appointments, and spend the extra time working on
the scalability challenge.
Sometimes
a good scalable source of value is a small pivot away from the
non-scalable work you’re already doing. For instance, suppose our
stylist is a great conversationalist, and suppose she noticed that
she gets better tips than her coworkers, perhaps 20% better on
average. And suppose she notices the pattern that hairstylists who
can carry interesting conversations while cutting hair are typically
getting larger tips from their clients.
She
could create a course to teach other stylists to become better
conversationalists. She could put that course into a digital form,
such as audios or videos, and offer it online. And the tangible
benefit she can offer is to help stylists increase their tips by up
to 20%. How much would 20% more tips be worth to a stylist over the
course of a year? Even if it’s just a modest 5% increase, how much
would that be worth? She can price and promote her course fairly
based on the real benefit she’s providing. Her course could be
worth hundreds of dollars to the right people, so she doesn’t need
a ton of sales to make a nice income from selling the course. As she
scales up the course sales, she can continuing working as a stylist
if she enjoys it, or she can retire from working as a stylist
altogether and focus on her course and other scalable offers.
In
this case she’s not making more haircuts happen, but she’s taking
a small subset of her work, one she might have easily overlooked, and
she’s recognizing that it can be a serious source of value for
other stylists (as well as for their clients). Furthermore, she might
even have the potential to expand her work into other fields that
also involve carrying on a conversation while serving customers.
I
know many dozens of people who’ve done these types of pivots in a
wide variety of fields. They can work very well in practice.
Notice
that the type of work changes though. First you create a source of
value that can scale, such as a course. Then you must also do the
work of scaling it. Nobody will know about our stylist’s course
unless she gets the word out, so her real work just shifted to
marketing and sales, most likely online. This will allow her to
leverage marketing tools to find clients and scale up the number of
people taking her course, even while she’s sleeping.
When
people get stuck in this process, they often miss this last step.
Scaling does take some work, and it is an activity. Most income
streams don’t auto-scale. You need to do the work of scaling them
up. Otherwise it’s like launching a website that no one visits.
But
notice the key difference between doing one-time work that doesn’t
scale versus doing the actual work of scaling up. In the latter case,
your rewards are compounded. For instance, you could set up a decent
system to attract potential students, and once you have that up and
running, you can keep building it up further.
As
I shared during Lesson 25 of the recent Deep Abundance Integration
course, a common difference between scarcity-minded people and
abundance-minded people is that scarcity-minded people typically
spend most of their time doing maintenance work. This means that they
work to maintain their income, such as by trading hours for dollars.
By contrast, abundance-minded people usually spend a good bit of time
on advancement work. They invest their time and energy to advance and
increase their income streams, not merely to maintain those streams.
How
many hours in a typical working month do you spend doing advancement
work? This means creating scalable income sources and then scaling
them up? Do you have any scalable income sources yet?
Of
course you won’t always succeed when you try to create a scalable
income source and then scale it up. But each time you try an approach
that doesn’t work, you’ll learn something, and you’ll
eventually discover approaches that do work.
Can
everyone scale up this way? What happens when everyone tries to do
this? Well… let me know when everyone really is trying in earnest
to do this since it would be a pretty huge shock to me. People really
seem to struggle with the basic mindset here, acting as if scalable
income is some alien concept. It seems clear that we’re moving into
a phase of life on earth where more and better scaling is becoming
possible and accessible thanks to the Internet and ever-evolving
tech, including further developments in AI.
I
have many friends who’ve scaled up to 7 and 8 figure income
streams, and they don’t work any harder than those with
non-scalable income. They just approach the problem of providing
value differently, thinking about scalability up front before
committing to a particular direction.
Making
Scalable Offers
If
you do any work at all, then you’re already making offers. So how
scalable are your offers?
If
you make offers with low scalability, such as trading your time for
money via salary or hourly rate, then you’re placing a fairly low
ceiling on your income. You may also be setting yourself up for a
sensation of time scarcity if the only realistic way to scale your
income is to work more hours (if you even have that option).
On
the other hand, if you make offers with high scalability, then as
soon as you pass the threshold of covering your expenses, everything
beyond that is a bonus. Interestingly, you may need different forms
of motivation to move beyond this point, such as developing a
stronger sense of mission or purpose.
Think
about some small subset of your work where you actually feel you do a
good job but you also feel like your skills in this area aren’t
being leveraged too well. Could you teach someone to get a little bit
better in some area of life? What would that mean to someone over the
course of a year or more?
There’s
nothing weird or odd about scalable offers. You may be less
experienced with them if you’re more familiar with offers that
don’t scale, but don’t dismiss the potential for learning to
leverage scalability. Even if you aren’t scaling your offers,
there’s a good chance you’re playing a role in someone else’s
scalable system. So if you aren’t scaling your value, someone else
is probably using you to scale theirs.
Personally
I find that my best framing for making scalable offers is caring. If
you genuinely care about providing value to people and creating some
positive ripples in the world, then why be so selfish with your value
and limit it to just a few people? Why not do something to help a lot
more people if you can?
I
learned this powerful lesson as a game developer. I could use my
talents to create a game, which was limiting, or I could share what I
learned from my own experience to help other game developers, which
was more expansive and scalable. This helped more developers complete
their projects, so more games got released, and more players got to
enjoy them. The ripples I could create from helping other developers
were greater than the ripples I’d been creating from working on my
own games. It was this mindset that helped me carry forward into
creating scalable sources of value when I began doing personal
development work years ago.
You
may have some internal objections to going this route, such as
wondering if you can provide any value worth scaling. Join the club.
Everyone has objections. The people who go this route just don’t
let their objections stop them. They see the irrationality of those
objections and use better reasoning. They understand that if they
seek ways to provide scalable value, it may take time, but they’ll
eventually figure it out.
This
is where caring helps again. If you care then you’ll also listen
and observe. You’ll find out if people are indeed receiving value
from your scalable offers, and you’ll learn what effect your
efforts are having. You won’t be able to measure all of the
ripples, but you’ll be able to see some of them, and that’s very
motivating when you start seeing positive ones.
One
of the key benefits of scaling that people often overlook is how much
thanks and appreciation they’ll receive (sometimes for the rest of
their lives) for providing value to people in ways that scale.
Consider how much appreciation J. K. Rowling must receive because she
took the time to share her imaginative stories in the form of a
scalable medium. When you tell a story, are you putting it into a
scalable form that can provide value to others indefinitely, or will
your stories die with you?
Environmental Reinforcement of Your Goals
Daily
affirmations are something you’ll commonly see recommended in
pop-psychology books. Each day you verbally affirm your goals as if
they’re already accomplished. However, you usually won’t get any
results at all with this approach — in most cases it’s an utter
waste of time.
Why
is this? Because every thought is an affirmation. If you spend 5
minutes a day saying to yourself, “I am a nonsmoker,” but 100
other minutes include thoughts that re-affirm your identity as a
smoker, such as periodically lighting up and seeing the smoke rise in
front of your face, you just won’t make a dent.
The
basic idea of trying to condition yourself to think in new ways is
sound, but verbal affirmations for a few minutes each day are a lousy
way to accomplish that.
If
you want to make some big changes in your life, you’ll need to
shift your identity and your habitual way of thinking. In previous
posts I discussed behavioral conditioning, which focused on shifting
your behavior, assuming your thoughts will follow. Now I’ll tackle
a different approach, which is that changing your habitual thoughts
can lead to a change in your behavior.
Chances
are if you’ve been stuck in your current situation and have been
unsuccessful in your attempts to grow into a new role that you really
want to achieve, your daily thoughts are continuing to reinforce your
old role. Many people who want to take this leap can’t seem to do
it, and one reason is that they spend too many hours per week
reinforcing their old identity while investing much less time
thinking about their new identity. So if you want to start your own
business, but your full-time job causes you to spend 40+ hours per
week thinking of yourself as an employee, it will be tough to make
the shift.
Let’s
bring this concept down to earth with a real-life example. One of my
goals for this year was to shift my career from game publishing to
writing and speaking. But of course I have an existing business which
reinforces my old identity in the games business. In order to
successfully make this shift, I have to change my thoughts and my
behaviors. I have to stop thinking about selling games and put more
thought and energy into writing and speaking.
But
what happened when I tried to make this shift initially? I started
out my day as usual and got caught up in the mindset of game
publishing. I worked in the same office, communicated with the same
people, visited the same forums, had to deal with the same kinds of
emails, and so on, and after several weeks I was still on the old
track. My environment was reinforcing my old identity, my old
thoughts, and my old behaviors. For a few hours here and there I’d
work on the new path, but very quickly I’d get sucked back into
game publishing work.
I
had to change my environment to stop reinforcing my old identity and
start reinforcing my new one. So I joined Toastmasters and started
attending weekly meetings. I shut down the popular game developer
forums I was running and worked to transfer the community to another
site, and then I stopped reading those forums completely. I automated
my games business as much as possible, so it doesn’t require much
maintenance at all. I decided not to renew my Association of
Shareware Professionals membership for 2005, even though I’ve been
a member since 1996. I declined an invitation to speak at the Game
Developers Conference in 2005, even though I moderated a popular
roundtable there for several years. I altered my office to reinforce
my new role. I cleared out the top drawer of my filing cabinet to
make room for speaking and writing files. I removed all
programming-related shortcuts from my Windows desktop and rearranged
my web browser favorites to add links to speaker sites while cutting
game-related links. I stopped reading game and shareware blogs and
found new speaking and personal development blogs to subscribe to. I
cut back dramatically on the amount of game-related email I handle. I
switched around the people I communicate with most frequently, such
that now I spend more time talking to people who think of me as a
speaker in training vs. a shareware or game publisher. I started
going to new seminars and workshops on speaking. I started this blog.
I discussed the change at length with my wife, so we’d both be
prepared for what to expect. And so on.
Some
of these may seem like drastic steps; most are minor adjustments. But
the net result has been that I’ve been able to flow through this
transition to where I now think of myself 90% as a speaker/writer and
only 10% as a game publisher. My environment is now reinforcing my
new role instead of my old one. The momentum is building in a new
direction to the point where it would be hard for me to go back.
All
of these adjustments create new thought affirmations. By removing
most of the links to my old identity, I remove those triggers that
would cause me to think in the old ways. And on top of that I’ve
added new triggers to affirm my new career path. And these new
thoughts affect my actions; my daily routine is now very different
than it used to be. A year from now things will be even more
different as the results begin to accumulate.
I
must say it was hard making some of these changes initially. What
helped me was to start with the small changes, like rearranging my
office. Then after a week or two, I was better able to make the
medium changes. And after some time, I was able to commit to bigger
changes. Now my sense of identity has shifted so much that when I run
into something that would reinforce my old role, it’s a lot easier
to say no.
I
recently popped into an old games forum I stopped reading months ago
just to see what my perspective on it would be now. It was a strange
experience; the discussions seemed familiar but also alien. I got a
sense of just how different my thinking is today than it was six
months ago. It’s like the feeling of going back to an old class
reunion, when you realize that the people you knew back then are
totally different people today.
I
think this process can work with many other kinds of changes too. If
your environment is reinforcing an identity you’re ready to shed,
how can you change it? A few little changes won’t be enough to
overcome inertia. But if you can keep building those changes so that
you shift more and more of your environment to your new role, that
probably will work. You’ll shift the balance of your thoughts from
affirming your new identity only 5% to pushing it to 50% and beyond.
Many people get started on this process, but they don’t take it far
enough to see results.
Look
around your home and ask yourself objectively, “What kind of person
lives here?” If I didn’t know who lived here, what would I
conclude about the inhabitant? Do the same for your office: “What
kind of person would work here?” Then make a list of the six people
with whom you spend the most time, and ask, “What kind of person
would associate with these people?” Are your answers to these
objective questions congruent with the kind of person you want to be?
If not, then what kind of environment would that person have? What
kind of friends? And how can you begin gradually shifting your
environment towards the new one? Maybe you can’t immediately get a
whole new house or a new job, but what little things can you change
right now — today — that would start you moving in that
direction?
*************************************************************************
Steve Pavlina is widely recognized as one of the most successful personal development bloggers in the world, with his work attracting more than 100 million visits to StevePavlina.com. He has written more than 1300 articles and recorded many audio programs on a broad range of self-help topics, including productivity, relationships, and spirituality. Steve has been quoted as an expert by the New York Times, USA Today, U.S. News & World Report, The Guardian, Chicago Tribune, Los Angeles Daily News, and many other publications.
Steve's articles, podcasts, and videos are uncopyrighted, so his work has been re-published and translated extensively. He is credited as the author or co-author of more than 150 books, with more being published each year.
Steve lives in Las Vegas and travels often.
Steve's articles, podcasts, and videos are uncopyrighted, so his work has been re-published and translated extensively. He is credited as the author or co-author of more than 150 books, with more being published each year.
Steve lives in Las Vegas and travels often.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Was It the Will of God for Job to Suffer Sickness and Affliction?
This is an interesting and important question. Often, when people become sick or experience affliction, they are tempted to believe that it ...
-
The Law of Contract One of the most important parts of Mercantile law in India is the Law of Contract. This law determines the areas cover...
-
Mastering Material Control: Maximizing Profitability and Efficiency in Manufacturing Material control, also known as material management, ...
-
Understanding Intermediate Products and Final Products: Implications for National Income Calculation It is important for you to understand...