If
you want to provide value in ways that scale, you ought to think
about scalability when choosing the format for providing your value.
Some modes of providing value scale much better than others.
The
Mindset of Scaling
Basically
you want to consider these three questions:
What
is the value I’m providing and to whom?
What
would it look like for 100 people to receive similar value
simultaneously?
How
can I continue to provide value while I’m sleeping?
Let’s
begin with the first question. Suppose you’re currently working as
a hairstylist. You provide value by cutting and styling people’s
hair. And suppose you currently serve one client at a time, so your
income is determined by the number of clients you serve and how much
you charge your average client. Maybe you sell some products on the
side as well.
You
can increase your income by becoming more skilled or by improving the
way you market your services, so you can charge more per client. But
your income is still largely determined by how many clients you can
get into your chair. Scaling beyond a certain point becomes
difficult.
Now
let’s try the second question. You couldn’t personally perform
hairstyling services for 100 people simultaneously, so you’ll need
help to provide this much value at once. You could recruit 100
stylists, perhaps by opening a very large salon. Then you could
invest your time in marketing and advertising, both for clients and
stylists, and it’s easier to scale these activities than it is to
scale styling hair. This might take some investment of course, but if
you received a share of each stylist’s revenue, you could scale
your income by hiring and training more stylists. Eventually you
might need to branch out to other regions and open more salons too.
There
are other pathways of course, but the key is that someone or
something else needs to be doing the haircuts. You have to break free
of the limitation of performing each haircut yourself. Instead of
doing the haircuts, you need to be responsible for making the
haircuts happen, which is a more flexible and expansive way of
thinking about providing value. If the value has been received
because of what you’ve set into motion, you’re still providing
it.
What
about the third question? If you want to provide haircuts even while
you’re sleeping, you could open a 24/7 salon and have stylists
working there at all hours. Or you could offer franchises for your
salons. Or you could create courses or training programs for stylists
or for other salon owners. If you make your training available
online, then people could take your courses anywhere in the world,
and people could be learning and using your methods to cut hair even
while you’re sleeping.
Digital
Scaling
Putting
content into digital form is a major scalability breakthrough that
allows you to create something once and then leverage it to provide
value to people again and again at near zero cost.
The
advantage of putting value into digital formats like text, audio,
video, images, or software is that you’ve eliminated some major
barriers to scalability. In particular, you’ve decoupled the
delivery of your value from your personal time.
Going
back to the hairstylist example, if you create a blog, video, ebook,
or online course to help other stylists, then there’s no effective
limit on how many other stylists can receive your value, even while
you’re sleeping.
The
main difference here is in mindset. By asking different questions,
you end up with different solutions. The main focus is on how to
provide value to more people. Today that focus is likely to lead you
to the Internet eventually. The Internet is humanity’s great
scaling mechanism for providing value globally.
How
to Scale
A
good first step in devising scalable approaches is to stop doing
things that don’t scale well. At least stop doing them in the ways
that don’t scale.
For
the hairstylist that means to stop cutting so much hair because
cutting hair yourself doesn’t scale well. Put more time and energy
into figuring out how to make good haircuts happen. For instance,
book slightly fewer appointments, and spend the extra time working on
the scalability challenge.
Sometimes
a good scalable source of value is a small pivot away from the
non-scalable work you’re already doing. For instance, suppose our
stylist is a great conversationalist, and suppose she noticed that
she gets better tips than her coworkers, perhaps 20% better on
average. And suppose she notices the pattern that hairstylists who
can carry interesting conversations while cutting hair are typically
getting larger tips from their clients.
She
could create a course to teach other stylists to become better
conversationalists. She could put that course into a digital form,
such as audios or videos, and offer it online. And the tangible
benefit she can offer is to help stylists increase their tips by up
to 20%. How much would 20% more tips be worth to a stylist over the
course of a year? Even if it’s just a modest 5% increase, how much
would that be worth? She can price and promote her course fairly
based on the real benefit she’s providing. Her course could be
worth hundreds of dollars to the right people, so she doesn’t need
a ton of sales to make a nice income from selling the course. As she
scales up the course sales, she can continuing working as a stylist
if she enjoys it, or she can retire from working as a stylist
altogether and focus on her course and other scalable offers.
In
this case she’s not making more haircuts happen, but she’s taking
a small subset of her work, one she might have easily overlooked, and
she’s recognizing that it can be a serious source of value for
other stylists (as well as for their clients). Furthermore, she might
even have the potential to expand her work into other fields that
also involve carrying on a conversation while serving customers.
I
know many dozens of people who’ve done these types of pivots in a
wide variety of fields. They can work very well in practice.
Notice
that the type of work changes though. First you create a source of
value that can scale, such as a course. Then you must also do the
work of scaling it. Nobody will know about our stylist’s course
unless she gets the word out, so her real work just shifted to
marketing and sales, most likely online. This will allow her to
leverage marketing tools to find clients and scale up the number of
people taking her course, even while she’s sleeping.
When
people get stuck in this process, they often miss this last step.
Scaling does take some work, and it is an activity. Most income
streams don’t auto-scale. You need to do the work of scaling them
up. Otherwise it’s like launching a website that no one visits.
But
notice the key difference between doing one-time work that doesn’t
scale versus doing the actual work of scaling up. In the latter case,
your rewards are compounded. For instance, you could set up a decent
system to attract potential students, and once you have that up and
running, you can keep building it up further.
As
I shared during Lesson 25 of the recent Deep Abundance Integration
course, a common difference between scarcity-minded people and
abundance-minded people is that scarcity-minded people typically
spend most of their time doing maintenance work. This means that they
work to maintain their income, such as by trading hours for dollars.
By contrast, abundance-minded people usually spend a good bit of time
on advancement work. They invest their time and energy to advance and
increase their income streams, not merely to maintain those streams.
How
many hours in a typical working month do you spend doing advancement
work? This means creating scalable income sources and then scaling
them up? Do you have any scalable income sources yet?
Of
course you won’t always succeed when you try to create a scalable
income source and then scale it up. But each time you try an approach
that doesn’t work, you’ll learn something, and you’ll
eventually discover approaches that do work.
Can
everyone scale up this way? What happens when everyone tries to do
this? Well… let me know when everyone really is trying in earnest
to do this since it would be a pretty huge shock to me. People really
seem to struggle with the basic mindset here, acting as if scalable
income is some alien concept. It seems clear that we’re moving into
a phase of life on earth where more and better scaling is becoming
possible and accessible thanks to the Internet and ever-evolving
tech, including further developments in AI.
I
have many friends who’ve scaled up to 7 and 8 figure income
streams, and they don’t work any harder than those with
non-scalable income. They just approach the problem of providing
value differently, thinking about scalability up front before
committing to a particular direction.
Making
Scalable Offers
If
you do any work at all, then you’re already making offers. So how
scalable are your offers?
If
you make offers with low scalability, such as trading your time for
money via salary or hourly rate, then you’re placing a fairly low
ceiling on your income. You may also be setting yourself up for a
sensation of time scarcity if the only realistic way to scale your
income is to work more hours (if you even have that option).
On
the other hand, if you make offers with high scalability, then as
soon as you pass the threshold of covering your expenses, everything
beyond that is a bonus. Interestingly, you may need different forms
of motivation to move beyond this point, such as developing a
stronger sense of mission or purpose.
Think
about some small subset of your work where you actually feel you do a
good job but you also feel like your skills in this area aren’t
being leveraged too well. Could you teach someone to get a little bit
better in some area of life? What would that mean to someone over the
course of a year or more?
There’s
nothing weird or odd about scalable offers. You may be less
experienced with them if you’re more familiar with offers that
don’t scale, but don’t dismiss the potential for learning to
leverage scalability. Even if you aren’t scaling your offers,
there’s a good chance you’re playing a role in someone else’s
scalable system. So if you aren’t scaling your value, someone else
is probably using you to scale theirs.
Personally
I find that my best framing for making scalable offers is caring. If
you genuinely care about providing value to people and creating some
positive ripples in the world, then why be so selfish with your value
and limit it to just a few people? Why not do something to help a lot
more people if you can?
I
learned this powerful lesson as a game developer. I could use my
talents to create a game, which was limiting, or I could share what I
learned from my own experience to help other game developers, which
was more expansive and scalable. This helped more developers complete
their projects, so more games got released, and more players got to
enjoy them. The ripples I could create from helping other developers
were greater than the ripples I’d been creating from working on my
own games. It was this mindset that helped me carry forward into
creating scalable sources of value when I began doing personal
development work years ago.
You
may have some internal objections to going this route, such as
wondering if you can provide any value worth scaling. Join the club.
Everyone has objections. The people who go this route just don’t
let their objections stop them. They see the irrationality of those
objections and use better reasoning. They understand that if they
seek ways to provide scalable value, it may take time, but they’ll
eventually figure it out.
This
is where caring helps again. If you care then you’ll also listen
and observe. You’ll find out if people are indeed receiving value
from your scalable offers, and you’ll learn what effect your
efforts are having. You won’t be able to measure all of the
ripples, but you’ll be able to see some of them, and that’s very
motivating when you start seeing positive ones.
One
of the key benefits of scaling that people often overlook is how much
thanks and appreciation they’ll receive (sometimes for the rest of
their lives) for providing value to people in ways that scale.
Consider how much appreciation J. K. Rowling must receive because she
took the time to share her imaginative stories in the form of a
scalable medium. When you tell a story, are you putting it into a
scalable form that can provide value to others indefinitely, or will
your stories die with you?
No comments:
Post a Comment